Quite recently I came across an issue when deploying a VPX instance on VMware 6.5, which resulted in a bug of the VPX image and underlying physical hardware.
For reference the following hardware was backing the hypervisor:
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 5118 CPU @ 2.30GHz
VMware ESXi, 6.5.0, 7967591 with vSAN
NetScaler VPX 12.0 57.24nc
When deploying the VPX appliance it will get the default VM version 7 which needs to get upgraded to VM version 11/13 to support VMXNET3 NIC interfaces, well easily said and done configured the setup and booted the appliance and got stumped with the following error:
right.. that’s a beauty.. after some troubleshooting and migrating the host to another host/cluster it started booting. Migrated it back and crashes.. reimported the appliance let it stay at hardware level 7, and upgraded it to 11 and still works, went to 13 again and crash.. Ok so this is not a user error :).
Logged a case with Citrix support and after some time got the reply this is in regards to a known issue with Intel Xeon Gold processors. The resolvement should be in NetScaler 12.1 build which is expected to release Q3 this year.
For now the workaround is to keep it at level 11, as a reference case# 77116209 can be used to log the same if it applies to your setup.
With the release of NS12.1 49.23.nc for NetScaler and NMAS you can now upgrade to the latest hardware level and everything works as expected. Also the default dashboard view won’t give any error of any kind in regards to the undefined message which would popup.
Came across a very peculiar issue at a customer in regards to the values:
- Max Login Attempts
- Failed Login Timeout
As soon as a value has been put in you could not reset it to the default value of 0, not from the GUI or CLI it would just not accept it as a value
After a support case and some days further the solution is maybe simple but I didn’t had it in mind, the simple unset command on the vpn vserver in regards to the maxloginattempts resolves it.
Hope it helps you out as well.
UPDATE: https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX234177 got published for this
We all know it, the once in a while “it’s slow logging on..” and then it gets dropped at the escalation desk for a resolution. So I got the call for troubleshooting this issue. Since I knew from previous experiences that uberAgent is the troubleshooting tool you will want for this I contacted them and requested the consulting license at https://uberagent.com/ (thanks to Helge Klein) did the installation of Splunk / Uberagent and got myself a monitoring baseline to work with. A little background on the setup:
- vSphere 6.0
- XenDesktop 7.15 / MCS – Windows 8.1 & Windows Server 2012 R2
- RES WorkspaceManager 10.1.300.1
The problem was at times users would have a profile initialization of 90 seconds! and at times the user shell would hang..
After a period of two weeks I would have my baseline with uberAgent and filtered out that this would be random very early start of the day or just after break time. No funny business whatsoever in the environment and no lack of resources e.g. iops or cpu/memory exhaustion, drilling down in some user trending with uberAgent I came to a somewhat recurring user base that experienced the issue. Ok! That helps and after that I could reproduce it with the useraccounts in question displaying the following screen:Dropped this in the resrockstars.slack.com group and got a quick reply from Dennis van Dam in regards to traceviewer and came to the following:This in turn pointed me out to the following support article:Problem resolved and a happy customer! Hope this helps you out as well.
HOWTO: Create a trace file
When I started to rebuild my lab I came across the most strangest thing when configuring my NetScaler’s again. First a little background regarding my setup:
VMware ESXi 6.5u1 Hypervisors
NetScaler VPX 1000 Platinum Appliances
Distributed vSwitches with vlan trunks enabled
Dedicated NSVLAN for management (tagged)
Data transport vlan tagged
Whilst configuring and setting op the first and secondary nodes I’ve let the default appliance imports intact, that is 2vcpu and 2gb of ram and changed the E1000 nic’s to VMXNET3 and upgraded the VM compatibility format to the latest level. Nothing wrong here and started configuring both appliances with their NSIP’s respectively. Created the HA set and all was well.
Then it was time to put in the second nic which I’m going to use for my data transport with all vlan tagged interfaces and ip’s. Gave both appliances a shutdown and configured the nic’s accordingly (so it seemed at the time it was late 😊)
First node came back flawlessly but the second node wasn’t reachable anymore.. So put open the hypervisor console and I saw error messages regarding the nic and that the instance had crashed. When I would log in with the nsroot account I would get nsnet_connect prevents logon… Well ok.. that one was familiar to me with in mind the switch of E1000 and VMXNET3 devices (had this when upgrading a customer’s setup and that was the VM compatibility level, because you will need the latest build to be able to use VMXNET3, the default appliance level isn’t enough) but I’ve got both appliances up to date… I thought what the !%!@% and logged in with the nsrecover username to be able to login to the shell and dig in deeper. Thank god that worked and I was able to run the command ns_hw_err.bash which will check for any hardware error. And yes I instantly got the nic not present and reachable message. Looked at the configuration of the nic’s and a nice homer simpson moment the nic in question was still a E1000.. right… so turned it off and removed the nic, re-added it with the same MAC and presto all is well again.
Moral of the story double check your network settings when using VMXNET3!!!!
Recently I got involved at a customer location which was going to use Remote PC catalogs in combination with their XenDesktop / XenApp 7.15 environment. This was no problem whatsoever to configure but on closer testing I encountered a bug that when you create for example a delivery group called “Windows 10 Remote PC” and adding more than one desktop the second, third and so on would get the published name of the local computer name e.g. WSDELL34951 which doesn’t comply with a standard name. The following can be observed for the delivery group name:Normally you would see at “PublishedName” an empty value, to correct this take a note of the “Uid” number and put in the following command:In this case my id was 4, and voila this will correct the name in StoreFront like in the following screenshot:
For the Multi Licensing part this needs to be done at the same level in powershell, see the following article:Multi-type licensing
In the previous screenshot you will see:
“LicenseModel” & “ProductCode” these need to be compliant with their respective edition of XenApp or XenDesktop license model, management is then per delivery group and not applicable for the entire site anymore. This would be a default for every new delivery group that will be created unless like in above screenshot you will add the “LicenseModel” & “ProductCode”
Hope this helps!
Finally had some time to implement the NetScaler Secure Web Gateway in my lab. I’ve put together a small document with my findings attached here: NFTL_TF_NSWG
comments or questions please let me know.
I came across an issue in my lab environment where the screen will go black while launching a session on Windows Server 2016. This is with XenApp/XenDesktop 7.15 LTSR
The following registry entry: DisableLogonUISuppression (D WORD Value 0) did not resolve the issue as stated in the following articles:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4034661/windows-10-update-kb4034661 and https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX225819
Ultimatly after some trial and error the deletion of all subkeys from below registry entries resolved it:
Throughout the XenMobile deployments with Certificate Based Authentication(CBA) I came across some items which I thought was worth mentioning.
1. CBA up until Secure Mail 10.6.20 / Secure Hub 10.6.20 was requesting new certificates on SSL exceptions, in effect the exceptions were triggered on every SSL connection error that occurred and thus requesting a new certificate from the PKI, this got resolved in version 10.6.20 by not using Java codes anymore but instead reading the NetScaler Gateway error code which gets presented to the client.
2. The PKI / Credential Provider settings configured with template, validity, CRL and renewal configured on the PKI server won’t work for CBA, this is because CBA is not a payload certificate but only a SIGN method. WiFi certificate which get pushed do honor the validity, renewal and CRL options.
3. With above actions you’ve might get a really large PKI environment which is not necessary and therefore maybe you would need to migrate to a new PKI server, this can be done side by side by creating a new PKI/Credential Provider and configuring those accordingly and migrate in a controlled fashion
4. You might see issued Certificates which aren’t valid anymore or revoked and those devices still get access to the MAM store, this is resolved when you apply CRL mandatory or OCSP mandatory see the following article for some more information regarding CRL: https://docs.citrix.com/en-us/netscaler/12/ssl/manage-cert-revocate-lists.html
Hope these lessons learned help and if there are any comments or questions please feel free to drop them here.
For those who are not aware Apple has an upcoming change regarding App Transport Security (ATS)
The date it should be in effect was originally January 2017… but was pushed back for migration purposes, and the new date is yet a mystery.
It will have impact! Be proactive and check your XenMobile / NetScaler environments:
– NetScaler 11.1 will be the preferred build for TLS1.2 and the ECDHE cipher suites
– XenMobile 10.4 RP4 and XenMobile 10.5 have the TLS1.2 and ECDHE cipher suites (plus ATS hotfix)
Once ATS is enforced, Apple will require at least one cipher suite enabled from a specific list of cipher suites. Apple supported ATS cipher suites are:
If SSL-Offloading is used in combination with XenMobile, remember that 11.1 is the preferred build.
I came across a peculiar issue regarding a new NetScaler SDX 14020 setup in combination with a Cisco Nexus C9372-PX-E and C9336PQ infrastructure, a new buildup of the SDX/VPX with multiple HA instances spinning and a working environment. LA sets configured for HA probes and everything nice and easy separated through vlan access. Long story short, at first it looked like a bug regarding the combination of NetScaler and Cisco: https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX215720 and created an support case with the follow ups with it, afterwards it seemed that the untagged management vlan setup was overlapping from data channels and the root cause for this was at the Cisco ACI side of things, the EPG(EndpointGroup) and BridgeDomain were overlapping in that case. The solution was to create a new and dedicated EPG/BridgeDomain for the data channels of the NetScaler.
So lessons learned:
- Double check the setup of the ACI even if you get the “yes it’s correct” statement from your customer